Single ServervsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Single Server | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 11 in Deployment | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 231 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.2.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 44/100 for Single Server, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Single Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Single Server needs more configuration.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).
Single Server details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep Single Server, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with