Single Servervssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Single Server | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 11 in Deployment | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 231 | 114 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 551 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.2.0 · 21 Jun 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 44/100 for Single Server, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Single Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Single Server is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 551 stars in 30 days).
Single Server details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep Single Server, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with