# signoz vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | signoz | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 32 473 ✓ | 15 905 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +298 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.148.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

signoz scores 79/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

signoz ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; signoz needs more configuration.

signoz is growing faster right now (+298 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [signoz](https://selfhost.directory/project/signoz) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/signoz.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/signoz-vs-transfersh