Signal TLS ProxyvsZot Registry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Signal TLS Proxy | Zot Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 25 in Proxy | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 1 284 | 2 921 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +122 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Zot Registry scores 64/100 against 49/100 for Signal TLS Proxy, so it is the safer default.
Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Signal TLS Proxy.
If you want the quickest setup, Signal TLS Proxy is easier to run; Zot Registry needs more configuration.
Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+122 stars in 30 days).
Signal TLS Proxy details →Zot Registry details →
Swap a project
Keep Signal TLS Proxy, compare it with
Keep Zot Registry, compare it with