# Signal TLS Proxy vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Signal TLS Proxy | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 25 in Proxy | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 284 | 89 750 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 411 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 49/100 for Signal TLS Proxy, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Signal TLS Proxy.

If you want the quickest setup, Signal TLS Proxy is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 411 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Signal TLS Proxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/signal-tls-proxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/signal-tls-proxy.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/signal-tls-proxy-vs-world-monitor