Signal TLS ProxyvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Signal TLS Proxy | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 25 in Proxy | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 1 284 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Urbit scores 63/100 against 49/100 for Signal TLS Proxy, so it is the safer default.
Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Signal TLS Proxy.
If you want the quickest setup, Signal TLS Proxy is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Urbit is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
Signal TLS Proxy details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep Signal TLS Proxy, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with