# Signal TLS Proxy vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Signal TLS Proxy | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 25 in Proxy | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 284 | 95 266 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 353 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 49/100 for Signal TLS Proxy, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Signal TLS Proxy.

If you want the quickest setup, Signal TLS Proxy is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 353 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Signal TLS Proxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/signal-tls-proxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/signal-tls-proxy.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/signal-tls-proxy-vs-stirling-pdf