# Signal TLS Proxy vs Sonatype Nexus

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Signal TLS Proxy | Sonatype Nexus |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 25 in Proxy | #2 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 284 | 2 689 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +34 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 30 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | release-3.97.2-02 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | EPL-1.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Sonatype Nexus scores 64/100 against 49/100 for Signal TLS Proxy, so it is the safer default.

Sonatype Nexus ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Signal TLS Proxy.

If you want the quickest setup, Signal TLS Proxy is easier to run; Sonatype Nexus needs more configuration.

Sonatype Nexus is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Signal TLS Proxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/signal-tls-proxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/signal-tls-proxy.md)
- [Sonatype Nexus](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonatype-nexus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonatype-nexus.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/signal-tls-proxy-vs-sonatype-nexus