Signal TLS ProxyvsApache SkyWalking
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Signal TLS Proxy | Apache SkyWalking | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 25 in Proxy | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 284 | 24 978 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 49/100 for Signal TLS Proxy, so it is the safer default.
Apache SkyWalking ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Signal TLS Proxy.
If you want the quickest setup, Signal TLS Proxy is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.
Apache SkyWalking is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).
Signal TLS Proxy details →Apache SkyWalking details →
Swap a project
Keep Signal TLS Proxy, compare it with
Keep Apache SkyWalking, compare it with