sidixvsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sidix | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 31/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 7 in Local AI | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 25 | 29 391 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +112 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 13 |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 22 Apr 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 31/100 for sidix, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for sidix.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; sidix needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep sidix, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with