# Shinobi vs WebSSH

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Shinobi | WebSSH |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #2 of 6 in SSH |
| GitHub stars | — | 224 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.6.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | — | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Shinobi scores 66/100 against 50/100 for WebSSH, so it is the safer default.

WebSSH ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.

If you want the quickest setup, WebSSH is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Shinobi](https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi.md)
- [WebSSH](https://selfhost.directory/project/webssh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/webssh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/shinobi-vs-webssh