# Shinobi vs WebCodex

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Shinobi | WebCodex |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | — | 2 447 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | — | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Shinobi scores 66/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.

WebCodex ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.

If you want the quickest setup, WebCodex is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Shinobi](https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi.md)
- [WebCodex](https://selfhost.directory/project/webcodex) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/webcodex.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/shinobi-vs-webcodex