# Shinobi vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Shinobi | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | — | 282 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | — | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Shinobi scores 66/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Uptime-Kuma-Web-API is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Shinobi](https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/shinobi-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api