# Shinobi vs torqvoice

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Shinobi | torqvoice |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #4 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | — | 45 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.2.64 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | — | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Shinobi scores 66/100 against 43/100 for torqvoice, so it is the safer default.

torqvoice ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.

If you want the quickest setup, torqvoice is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.

torqvoice is growing faster right now (+2 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Shinobi](https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shinobi.md)
- [torqvoice](https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/torqvoice.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/shinobi-vs-torqvoice