Shinobivsteslamateapi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Shinobi | teslamateapi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance | #3 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | — | 257 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | v1.25.0 · 7 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | — | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Shinobi scores 66/100 against 46/100 for teslamateapi, so it is the safer default.
teslamateapi ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shinobi.
If you want the quickest setup, teslamateapi is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.
Shinobi details →teslamateapi details →