Shieldsvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Shields | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 166 in Developer Tools | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 27 331 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +125 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Shields scores 80/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Shields is easier to run; supabase-automated-self-host needs more configuration.
Shields is growing faster right now (+125 stars in 30 days).
Shields details →supabase-automated-self-host details →