# shield vs UrBackup

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | shield | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 60/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Backup Management | #18 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 402 | 943 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v9.0.2 · 11 Aug 2026 | 2.5.38 · 30 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |

## Which one should you pick?

UrBackup scores 60/100 against 50/100 for shield, so it is the safer default.

UrBackup ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for shield.

If you want the quickest setup, UrBackup is easier to run; shield needs more configuration.

UrBackup is growing faster right now (+21 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [shield](https://selfhost.directory/project/shield) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/shield.md)
- [UrBackup](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/shield-vs-urbackup