# sglang vs trip2g

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sglang | trip2g |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 325 ✓ | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 917 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

sglang scores 86/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.

sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.

If you want the quickest setup, trip2g is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.

sglang is growing faster right now (+1 917 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sglang](https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang.md)
- [trip2g](https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sglang-vs-trip2g