sglangvsSnort
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sglang | Snort | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference | #53 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 38 338 | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 930 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 | v0.5.3 · 8 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
sglang scores 86/100 against 47/100 for Snort, so it is the safer default.
sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Snort.
If you want the quickest setup, Snort is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.
sglang is growing faster right now (+1 930 stars in 30 days).
sglang details →Snort details →