# Serendipity vs Typecho

> Two self-hosted [Blogging projects](https://selfhost.directory/blogging), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Serendipity | Typecho |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 24 in Blogging | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 229 | 12 456 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | 2.6.1 · 22 Jul 2026 ✓ | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Typecho scores 66/100 against 53/100 for Serendipity, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; Serendipity needs more configuration.

Typecho is growing faster right now (+9 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Serendipity](https://selfhost.directory/project/serendipity) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/serendipity.md)
- [Typecho](https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/serendipity-vs-typecho