# Serena-MCP vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Serena-MCP | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 166 in Developer Tools | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 30 795 | 89 697 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 041 | +2 408 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 19 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 82/100 for Serena-MCP, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Serena-MCP.

If you want the quickest setup, Serena-MCP is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 408 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Serena-MCP](https://selfhost.directory/project/serena-mcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/serena-mcp.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/serena-mcp-vs-world-monitor