# sentry vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sentry | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 45 671 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +839 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | search-syntax@1.0.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

sentry scores 80/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

sentry ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.

If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.

sentry is growing faster right now (+839 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sentry-vs-woodpecker-ci