sentryvsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sentry | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 45 672 | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +833 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 3 |
| Latest release | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sentry scores 80/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.
If you want the quickest setup, WhisperLive---CPU is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.
sentry is growing faster right now (+833 stars in 30 days).
sentry details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep sentry, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with