# sentry vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sentry | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 45 671 ✓ | 15 905 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +839 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | search-syntax@1.0.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

sentry scores 80/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

sentry ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.

sentry is growing faster right now (+839 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sentry-vs-transfersh