# sentry vs transcriber

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sentry | transcriber |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 45 680 ✓ | 154 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +841 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sentry scores 80/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.

If you want the quickest setup, transcriber is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.

sentry is growing faster right now (+841 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)
- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sentry-vs-transcriber