# sentry vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sentry | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 45 671 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +839 | +5 457 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | search-syntax@1.0.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 80/100 for sentry, so it is the safer default.

sentry ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sentry-vs-tradingagents