# sentry vs SyncWatch同步观影

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | sentry | SyncWatch同步观影 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 45 678 ✓ | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +839 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

sentry scores 80/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for SyncWatch同步观影.

If you want the quickest setup, SyncWatch同步观影 is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.

sentry is growing faster right now (+839 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)
- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/sentry-vs-syncwatch