# Semaphore UI vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Semaphore UI | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 14 337 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +149 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Semaphore UI scores 73/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Semaphore UI ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Semaphore UI is growing faster right now (+149 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Semaphore UI](https://selfhost.directory/project/semaphore-ui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/semaphore-ui.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/semaphore-ui-vs-windows-arm