# Semaphore UI vs SparkyFitness

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Semaphore UI | SparkyFitness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 14 337 ✓ | 6 503 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +149 | +392 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 27 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Semaphore UI scores 73/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.

SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for Semaphore UI.

If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; SparkyFitness needs more configuration.

SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+392 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Semaphore UI](https://selfhost.directory/project/semaphore-ui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/semaphore-ui.md)
- [SparkyFitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/semaphore-ui-vs-sparkyfitness