Semaphore UIvsSparkyFitness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Semaphore UI | SparkyFitness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 14 334 | 6 498 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +151 | +398 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 26 |
| Latest release | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 | v1.9.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Semaphore UI scores 73/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.
SparkyFitness ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for Semaphore UI.
If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; SparkyFitness needs more configuration.
SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+398 stars in 30 days).
Semaphore UI details →SparkyFitness details →