self-workerdvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| self-workerd | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 36/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 7 in Serverless | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 141 | 13 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +299 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 36/100 for self-workerd, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for self-workerd.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; self-workerd needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).
self-workerd details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep self-workerd, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with