# Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted [Monitoring & observability projects](https://selfhost.directory/monitoring-observability), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #77 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 165 | 93 036 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 289 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.2.7 · 29 Jul 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 45/100 for Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM), so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM).

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM)](https://selfhost.directory/project/self-hosted-metrics-shm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/self-hosted-metrics-shm.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/self-hosted-metrics-shm-vs-uptime-kuma