# self-hosted-livesync-server vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | self-hosted-livesync-server | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #37 of 40 in Database Management | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 274 | 2 675 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +18 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

WBO scores 61/100 against 45/100 for self-hosted-livesync-server, so it is the safer default.

WBO ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for self-hosted-livesync-server.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; self-hosted-livesync-server needs more configuration.

WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [self-hosted-livesync-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/self-hosted-livesync-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/self-hosted-livesync-server.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/self-hosted-livesync-server-vs-wbo