# self-hosted-livesync-server vs supabase

> Two self-hosted [Database Management projects](https://selfhost.directory/database-management), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | self-hosted-livesync-server | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #37 of 40 in Database Management | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 274 | 114 252 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 543 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 45/100 for self-hosted-livesync-server, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for self-hosted-livesync-server.

If you want the quickest setup, self-hosted-livesync-server is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 543 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [self-hosted-livesync-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/self-hosted-livesync-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/self-hosted-livesync-server.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/self-hosted-livesync-server-vs-supabase