# seedsync vs sentry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | seedsync | sentry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 11 in File Transfer & Sync | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 337 | 45 678 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +839 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sentry scores 80/100 against 46/100 for seedsync, so it is the safer default.

sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for seedsync.

If you want the quickest setup, seedsync is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.

sentry is growing faster right now (+839 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [seedsync](https://selfhost.directory/project/seedsync) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seedsync.md)
- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seedsync-vs-sentry