# SeaweedFS vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 35 794 ✓ | 15 762 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +869 ✓ | +102 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 76/100 for Zigbee2MQTT, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Zigbee2MQTT.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-zigbee2mqtt