# SeaweedFS vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 35 793 ✓ | 16 058 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +868 ✓ | +243 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 80/100 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 28 for SeaweedFS.

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+868 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap