# SeaweedFS vs Xibo CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | Xibo CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #2 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 35 794 ✓ | 517 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +833 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.5.5 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 59/100 for Xibo CMS, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Xibo CMS.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+833 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [Xibo CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/xibo-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xibo-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-xibo-cms