SeaweedFSvswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 35 798 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +837 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 15 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for wyoming-piper.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+837 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →wyoming-piper details →