# SeaweedFS vs WPS Office

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | WPS Office |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 35 803 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +842 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 ✓ | 21 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Dockerfile |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for WPS Office.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+842 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [WPS Office](https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wps-office.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-wps-office