# SeaweedFS vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 35 794 ✓ | 8 066 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +869 ✓ | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-woodpecker-ci