# SeaweedFS vs WireGuard Easy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | WireGuard Easy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #7 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 35 794 ✓ | 27 319 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +869 ✓ | +331 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v15.5.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 73/100 for WireGuard Easy, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for WireGuard Easy.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [WireGuard Easy](https://selfhost.directory/project/wireguard-easy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wireguard-easy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-wireguard-easy