SeaweedFSvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 35 793 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +868 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 10 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+868 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →Windows ARM details →