SeaweedFSvswikmd
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | wikmd | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #5 of 8 in Documentation Management |
| GitHub stars | 35 798 | 423 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +837 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 1 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.10.7 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 45/100 for wikmd, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for wikmd.
If you want the quickest setup, wikmd is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+837 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →wikmd details →