# SeaweedFS vs Warpgate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | Warpgate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 35 794 ✓ | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +869 ✓ | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.

Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 28 for SeaweedFS.

If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [Warpgate](https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-warpgate