# SeaweedFS vs TypeType

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | TypeType |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 35 807 ✓ | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +846 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TypeType.

If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+846 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [TypeType](https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-typetype