SeaweedFSvstunesynctool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | tunesynctool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 35 794 | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +869 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 1 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →tunesynctool details →