# SeaweedFS vs trip2g

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | SeaweedFS | trip2g |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 35 803 ✓ | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +842 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+842 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)
- [trip2g](https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/seaweedfs-vs-trip2g