SeaweedFSvsTrinity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 35 799 | 713 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +838 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 4 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+838 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →Trinity details →