SeaweedFSvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 35 794 | 117 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +869 | +5 518 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 11 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 81/100 for SeaweedFS, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 518 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →TradingAgents details →